Showing posts with label The Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Media. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Woodstock to Altamont

Lots of high weirdness in the 'press' this week, as the baby boomers are aging and coming clean about what they have done. For instance former French President Jacques Chirac was taken aback by George W Bush's religious reasoning for invading Iraq:

Now out of office, Chirac recounts that the American leader appealed to their “common faith” (Christianity) and told him: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East…. The biblical prophecies are being fulfilled…. This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a New Age begins.”

In other muderous crank news Paul Krassner, first publisher of Robert Anton Wilson writes about taking acid with 'Squeaky' Fromme, one of Charles Manson's most devoted followers who later attempted to assassinate then US president Gerald Ford and is soon to be released from prison.



Squeaky and I stared silently at each other for a while -- I recalled that Manson had written, "I never picked up anyone who had not already been discarded by society" -- and eventually my eyes began to tear. There were tears in Squeaky's eyes too. She asked me to try on Charlie's vest. It felt like a bizarre honor to participate in this family ceremony. The corduroy vest was a solid inch thick with embroidery -- snakes and dragons and devilish designs including human hair that had been woven into the multi-colored patterns.

But the strangest of recent boomer revelations comes from the eternally suprising freak-film director John Waters writing eloquently about his sincere support for one of Charles Manson's followers, who did kill someone, to be released on parole:

Leslie Van Houten always seemed the one that could have somehow ended up making movies with us instead of running with the killer dune-buggy crowd. She was pretty, out of her mind, rebellious, with fashion-daring, a good haircut, and a taste for LSD -- just like the girls in my movies. Instead of being a "good soldier" for Charlie and participating in the murders of Leno and Rosemary La Bianca, which she certainly believed was the right thing to do at the time, I wish she had been with us in Baltimore on location for Pink Flamingos the day Divine ate dog shit for real (our own cultural Tate/La Bianca).

As Hunter said, when the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
...
Squeaky Photo by Dick Schmidt

Monday, July 27, 2009

Synthetic risk taking

There was an article in the Sunday Age near another piece about the deaths of young drivers. It suggested that teenagers and young adults cannot properly process risk. The author Reid Sexton quoted an academic from Monash Uni, Simon Crisp, who used the prase above. It refers to a lack of 'real' risk in young peoples lives and experience with only the mediated kind where energy packs or special effects determine the outcome. This is probably true, actually hurting yourself can be an education, as can achieving calculated risky goals. It's as important to understand and respect your limits as it is to push them. For this I have a suggestion.

Skate
Photobucket
board
Photobucket
-ing!
Photobucket

and maybe riding a BMX too.
Photobucket
...
Skateboard photos by Brooks Fritz & Jefferson Todd
BMX photo by Brinx
Original article at The Age

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Hideous to the eye

Cave snubs Jackson tribute in favour of Fawcett

Photobucket

Goth-rocker Nick Cave stunned revellers at Britain's Glastonbury music festival on Sunday (28 Jun 2009) after he failed to pay tribute to fellow musician Michael Jackson - choosing to dedicate his set to late Charlie's Angels star Farrah Fawcett instead. ... As the shocking reports reverberated across the globe, Glastonbury organisers insisted the weekend music bash would be dedicated to Jackson. But there was one rocker at the event who failed to remember the pop icon - Nick Cave confused the crowd at his set by paying tribute to Fawcett, and totally forgetting to mention the Thriller hitmaker. As he took the mic on Glastonbury's Pyramid Stage, he told fans, "We'd like to dedicate this set to the late, great... Farrah Fawcett."
...
From nick-cave.com

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

ARS: Not funny

A totally unsurprising new study has found that the more young people felt they had to look attractive in order to be accepted by their peers they were, wait for it, more sensitive to being rejected on the basis of their appearance Also found was that this effect was stronger for women than men. Wow. More interesting was that the study also found that there was no relationship between the degree that these young peoples parents were concerned about their appearance and the participants sensitivity to being rejected on the basis of their appearance. However the final and again unsurprising result does strike me as important, that of the role of the media.

It’s pervasive and almost unavoidable, in the city even if you don’t own a telly it’s hard not to notice big billboards or tram ads. Well, sadly and predictably this study found that greater internalisation of media based ideals of attractiveness predicted greater appearance based rejection sensitivity* in both sexes. That is, the more these people identified beauty with that presented in the media, the more likely they were to anxiously expect and overact to signs of rejection based on their appearance. This point is key, as it is the internalisation of these ideal of beauty that causes grief for all of us not just these 220 students in Buffalo, NY, USA.


Evolutionary psychology suggests that indicators of beauty, such as symmetry are also likely indicators of good health, thus we find these indicators pleasant and attractive. So to some extent the link between attractiveness and acceptance is a given and may be beneficial to us. However the ability of today’s media (and us) to easily search for and present beauty means our ‘peer group’ likely includes the drop-dead gorgeous whom we’ll never meet. As these evolutionarily powerful images are easily recalled, when we compare ourselves we face some strong competition and not even the example, good or otherwise, set by our parents will affect this.

What I want know however, is the relationship between internalising the media ideals and media consumption. Is it the acceptance of these ideals that results in this internalisation or is the amount, the volume and frequency, of beauty seen also a factor in internalising these ideals irrespective of a critical attitude? Can we inoculate ourselves?

Because it’s very hard to avoid.
...
Lora E. Park, Ann Marie DiRaddo, Rachel M. Calogero. Sociocultural Influence And Appearance-based Rejection Sensitivity Among College Students. Psychology of Women Quarterly; 33 (1)
From sciencedaily

*humorously this was shortened to Appearance-RS, i guess writing ARS all the time might have diminished the overall tone of the paper.


 
Site Meter